Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42174561›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2026

When double-J stents become a risk: bilateral distal ureteric urothelial carcinoma following ureteric instrumentation: a case report.

Salma Eldesouki, Amr Elmekresh, Hamzeh Esmaeilpour, Senthil Kumar, Khaldon Abo Alsel, Elham Mahjoor Azad, Fariborz Bagheri

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salma EldesoukiDepartment of Urology, Dubai Hospital, Mohamed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Amr ElmekreshDepartment of Urology, Dubai Hospital, Mohamed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. a.mekresh@yahoo.com.
Hamzeh EsmaeilpourDepartment of Urology, Dubai Hospital, Mohamed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Senthil KumarDepartment of Urology, Dubai Hospital, Mohamed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Khaldon Abo AlselDepartment of Urology, Dubai Hospital, Mohamed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Elham Mahjoor AzadDepartment of Family Medicine, Medcare Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Fariborz BagheriDepartment of Urology, Dubai Hospital, Mohamed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon but clinically significant event in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), particularly in those with high-risk or recurrent disease. Proposed mechanisms include field cancerization and intraluminal tumor seeding, while ureteric instrumentation has been discussed as a potential contributing factor. Emerging evidence suggests that retrograde ureteric stent placement performed concurrently with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) may be associated with an increased risk of subsequent upper tract involvement. We report the first case of bilateral distal ureteric urothelial carcinoma developing in close temporal association with first-time ureteric stent placement in a patient with recurrent NMIBC. CASE REPORT: A 78-year-old man with recurrent high-grade NMIBC underwent bilateral ureteric stent placement during TURBT for obstructive uropathy, with no prior evidence of UTUC. Within months, imaging demonstrated progressive distal ureteric abnormalities. Subsequent cystoscopy and bilateral ureteroscopy revealed extensive papillary tumors involving both distal ureters with proximal extension, in addition to recurrent bladder lesions. Histopathology confirmed high-grade, non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. At re-intervention, both indwelling stents were encased within tumor tissue.

conclusionThis case highlights the multifactorial nature of metachronous UTUC in patients with recurrent bladder cancer and supports the hypothesis that ureteric instrumentation may contribute to upper tract tumor dissemination in selected high-risk settings. Careful consideration of urinary diversion strategies and close upper tract surveillance remain important when managing patients with active bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellNeoplasms, Second PrimaryStentsUreteral NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsTransurethral Resection of BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsMetachronous tumorNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerUpper tract urothelial carcinomaUreteric stentUrinary diversionUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42174561
PMCPMC13371455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.