ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Effect of intramedullary nail length on the biomechanical performance of internal fixation for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the biomechanical performance of different lengths of intramedullary nails combined with reconstruction plates for fixation of Seinsheimer type IV subtrochanteric femoral fractures using finite element analysis, with additional evaluation of osteoporotic bone conditions.
methodsA three-dimensional finite element model of Seinsheimer type IV subtrochanteric femoral fracture was constructed from CT data of a 51-year-old male volunteer. Three PFNA intramedullary nail lengths combined with a reconstruction plate were modelled: long-nail (320 mm), medium-nail (240 mm), and short-nail (160 mm) combinations. Each construct was analysed under axial (2,100 N), bending (175 N), and torsional (15 N·m) loading conditions in both healthy and osteoporotic bone subgroups (elastic modulus reduced to 60% of normal). Overall displacement, femoral stress, implant stress, and load-sharing ratio were evaluated.
resultsUnder axial loading, the medium-nail combination exhibited the smallest maximum femoral displacement (10.7 mm healthy; 13.3 mm osteoporosis), while the short-nail combination showed the largest (13.2 mm; 19.7 mm) and the greatest sensitivity to bone quality. The short-nail combination generated the highest femoral stress under axial loading (325.4 MPa, 32.1% above the long-nail combination) and the highest nail stress under bending (199.4 MPa); the medium-nail combination produced notably high nail stress under torsion (300.7 MPa). The short-nail combination also exhibited substantially higher reconstruction plate stress under axial loading (804.5 MPa) relative to the long-nail (654.9 MPa) and medium-nail (578.8 MPa) combinations. Load-sharing analysis showed that the intramedullary nail bore the largest load fraction across all constructs (~ 47%-63%), and the long-nail combination demonstrated the most substantial load redistribution under osteoporotic conditions.
conclusionThe medium-nail combination may offer superior displacement control under axial loading, while the short-nail combination was associated with higher stress levels across multiple loading modes and greater biomechanical vulnerability in osteoporotic bone. Intramedullary nail length should be selected individually, accounting for fracture type, bone quality, and anticipated loading demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.