ArticleBMC medical education2026
Selecting for empathy? A cross-sectional study on empathy and empathic care intentions in newly enrolled dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacy students in Singapore to inform admissions and training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmpathy is a key attribute of healthcare professionals. While it can be nurtured, predispositions toward empathy predict success in healthcare training and practice. We examined empathy and empathic care intentions among newly enrolled healthcare students from Dentistry, Medicine, Nursing, and Pharmacy in Singapore to inform admissions and curriculum planning.
methodsNewly enrolled students from the four disciplines at the National University of Singapore were invited to participate. Empathy was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Professions Student version (JSE-HPS), while empathic care intentions were assessed with a custom-designed seven-item instrument. Parametric or non-parametric statistical tests were used to compare scores between disciplines and across demographic categories. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsA total of 646 students participated, with a 37% response rate. The median empathy score was 109 (IQR: 102-116) out of 140. Medicine students had significantly higher empathy scores than students from other disciplines, and Dentistry students scored significantly higher than Nursing students. Similar patterns were observed for empathic care intentions, with Medicine and Dentistry students scoring significantly higher than Nursing and Pharmacy counterparts.
conclusionsNewly enrolled dentistry and medical students had higher empathy and empathic care intentions scores that their counterparts studying Nursing and Pharmacy. Our findings emphasize the importance of integrating valid empathy assessments into the admissions process to identify students who are well-suited for healthcare training and practice. Simultaneously, curricula should be designed to purposefully nurture empathy throughout the training period. This is especially crucial for disciplines where more stringent admissions procedures are not warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.