ArticleBMC public health2026
Development of an interpretable machine learning model-based online tool for risk prediction of falls and fall-related injuries in Chinese middle-aged and older adults with depressive symptoms-a longitudinal study based on the CHARLS database.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to establish and validate interpretable Machine Learning (ML) models for predicting falls and fall-related injuries in middle-aged and older adults with depressive symptoms (DS) and to develop relevant online computational tools.
methodsUsing data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) survey from 2015 to 2018, 32 predictor variables related to the risk of falls and fall-related injuries in middle-aged and older adults with DS were included based on five dimensions of the health ecology model, and the important predictor variables were screened using Principal Component Analysis and LASSO regression at the same time. We further developed eight ML algorithms-Logistic Regression(LR), Support Vector Machine(SVM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Neural Network (NN), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost)-to construct the risk prediction model, and selected the best predictive variables based on grid search and 10-fold cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used for personalised interpretation of the models. In addition, we further performed stratified analyses by dividing participants into two age groups: 45-59 years and 60 years and older.
resultsAmong 3,664 middle-aged and older adults with DS, the incidence rate of falls and fall-related injuries after three years of follow-up was 20.36% and 8.92%, respectively. Among all models, LightGBM had the best performance. LightGBM performed the best, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.802-0.841) for the fall risk test set and an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.892-0.919) for the fall injury risk test set. We identified important risk factors for falls and fall-related injuries in middle-aged and older adults with DS. The optimal predictive model and risk predictors differed from those identified before stratification by age. SHAP visualises the specific contributions of these risk factors, thereby enhancing the model's value for application. Online tools to implement the model are available at https://riskpredictiontool.shinyapps.io/falls_prediction_tool/ and https://riskpredictiontool.shinyapps.io/fall_related_injuries_prediction_tool/. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThe results can help predict risk of falls and fall-related injuries among middle-aged and older adults with DS. These findings provide an important guide for the development of public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.