ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Noninvasive prediction of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer based on integrated photoacoustic imaging.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting Ki67 expression is crucial for understanding tumor proliferation and guiding personalized breast cancer treatment. Non-invasive methods remain limited, underscoring the need for innovative imaging-based approaches to enhance molecular subtyping and clinical decisions. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a predictive model integrating photoacoustic/ultrasound (PA/US) imaging data and clinical variables to differentiate high and low Ki67 expression levels in breast cancer. It sought to identify imaging and clinical factors associated with Ki67 expression, contributing to the molecular subtyping of breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, 336 breast tumors were analyzed and divided into high Ki67 expression (≥14%) and low Ki67 expression (<14%) groups. The samples were randomly split into training and test sets at a 7:3 ratio. Statistical methods included t‑tests and rank‑sum tests, with independent predictors identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Four predictive models were developed: Model A (clinical factors), Model B (clinical factors combined with ultrasound features), Model C (combining clinical, ultrasound, and photoacoustic oxygen saturation [PA‑SO₂]), and Model D (clinical factors combined with PA‑SO₂).
resultsUsing univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, four independent predictive factors were identified: histological grade, axillary lymph node status (ALN), intratumoral color Doppler flow imaging (Inter CDFI), and PA‑SO₂. Based on these factors, four logistic regression models were constructed for predicting high vs. low Ki67 expression: Model A (clinical factors only): histological grade + ALN; Model B (clinical + ultrasound): Model A + Inter CDFI; Model C (comprehensive model): Model B + PA‑SO₂; Model D (comprehensive model): Model A + PA‑SO₂. In the test set, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) with 95% confidence intervals were as follows: Model A, 0.781 (0.696-0.866); Model B, 0.779 (0.691-0.867); Model C, 0.823 (0.739-0.908), and Model D, 0.807 (0.721-0.892). Model C demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficiency for distinguishing Ki67 expression levels.
conclusionThis study developed a predictive model incorporating histological grade, ALN, Inter CDFI, and PA‑SO₂ to estimate Ki67 expression levels in breast cancer. This model provides a valuable tool for early prognosis, aiding molecular classification and facilitating the prompt initiation of personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.