ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Quantitative analysis of anterior and posterior chamber parameters of primary angle-closure glaucoma based on level set method.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe study aimed to accurately measure anterior and posterior chamber parameters in ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) images and to quantify their relationship with intraocular pressure (IOP), axial length (AL) and lens thickness (LT), enhancing the understanding of primary angle-closure disease.
methodsUBM images of 135 patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma(PACG) and 30 healthy individuals were analyzed. The Level set method was used to measure anterior chamber depth (ACD) and posterior chamber area (PCA). Relative error and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the accuracy and consistency of these measurements compared to the ground truth. IOP, AL and LT were also measured, and the relationships between ACD, PCA, IOP, AL and LT were explored using Spearman correlation analysis.
resultsThe Level set method yielded highly accurate measurements of ACD and PCA with low Relative errors and high ICC values. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that PCA was significantly positively correlated with both AL (R = 0.398, p = 0.002) and LT (R = 0.255, p = 0.006). In contrast, no statistically or clinically significant associations were found for the remaining parameter pairs (e.g., ACD-IOP, PCA-IOP), all of which showed |R|<0.2 and P > 0.05.
conclusionThe Level set method proves to be a highly accurate and consistent technique for UBM image analysis, boosting measurement efficiency and reproducibility. The significant correlations of PCA with AL and LT offer new insights into the anatomical complexity of angle-closure disease, emphasizing the posterior chamber as a critical dimension for further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.