ReviewDrugs & aging2026
Guideline-Directed Heart Failure Pharmacotherapy in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: Evidence Gaps, Tolerability, and Implications for Clinical Practice.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure predominantly affects older adults, yet the evidence supporting guideline-directed medical therapy is largely derived from randomized controlled trials predominantly enrolling younger and less frail populations. Adults aged ≥75 years remain underrepresented, raising important questions regarding the generalizability of trial evidence to contemporary geriatric practice. This review focuses on the applicability, tolerability, and clinical relevance of guideline-directed medical therapy in adults aged ≥75 years, with particular attention to objective outcomes and feasibility markers such as adverse events, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, mortality, frailty-related vulnerability, and patient-centred functional implications. We conducted a structured narrative critical review of pivotal randomized controlled trials underpinning modern heart failure pharmacotherapy, without formal systematic selection or meta-analysis. Published data were extracted on age distribution, exclusion criteria relevant to older adults, efficacy outcomes (mortality and hospitalization when reported), safety outcomes (hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalaemia, and treatment discontinuation), and geriatric domains or frailty-related measures when available. Trial findings were interpreted through established geriatric frameworks, including frailty and multimorbidity constructs. Across major heart failure trials, mean participant age ranged from 61 to 67 years, with very limited inclusion of patients aged ≥75 years and very limited representation of patients aged ≥80 years. While relative treatment efficacy appears preserved with ageing, older participants experienced higher rates of hypotension, renal dysfunction, and treatment discontinuation, whereas frailty, functional status, cognition, and other geriatric domains were rarely measured. Key geriatric domains-frailty, functional status, cognition, nutrition, and polypharmacy-were systematically absent from trial designs. This narrative review highlights a persistent gap between clinical trial populations and older patients with heart failure in routine care. In adults aged ≥75 years, application of guideline-directed medical therapy should remain evidence-aligned but clinically adapted, with slower titration, closer monitoring, and acceptance of tolerated submaximal doses when frailty, multimorbidity, or limited physiological reserve reduce treatment feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42174326What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.