Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42174306›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2026

A Location-Specific Hyperdense Area Score Predicts Severe Mass Effect after Thrombectomy.

SiShan Wen, Hao Tang, JiaNan Li, QiJi Jin, Xi Shen, Lulu Xiao, AnYu Liao, WuSheng Zhu, ChangSheng Zhou, Liang Pan and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

SiShan Wen *Department of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Hao Tang *Department of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
JiaNan LiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
QiJi JinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Xi ShenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Lulu XiaoDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
AnYu LiaoDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
WuSheng ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
ChangSheng ZhouDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Liang PanDepartment of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Jie ChenDepartment of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Wei XingDepartment of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Qian ChenDepartments of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
XinDao YinDepartments of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Duchang ZhaiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China.
JianRui LiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China.
Wu CaiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China.
XiaoQing ChengDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, 210002, Jiangsu, China. rabbitkiller80@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7289-9017

Funding

Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission M2024102Suzhou Clinical Key Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Special Project LCZX202309the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China 82271983the Project of State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University GZK12024025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke, hyperdense areas (HDAs) on post-thrombectomy computed tomography (CT) reflect blood-brain barrier injury and may herald malignant edema or hemorrhagic transformation. Both complications can progress to life-threatening mass effect, often necessitating surgical interventions such as decompressive craniectomy. We aimed to develop and validate a location-specific HDA score for predicting severe mass effect.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study analyzed 865 patients exhibiting HDAs on post-thrombectomy CT. The primary outcome was severe mass effect, defined as decompressive craniectomy or midline shift ≥ 5 mm on follow-up imaging. A location-specific HDA score was developed by expanding the ASPECTS template to include subarachnoid and ventricular compartments. Predictive models integrating imaging and clinical variables were constructed via LASSO regression and validated internally (bootstrapping) and externally.

resultsThree HDA locations independently predicted the outcome: insula [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-3.73, P = 0.030], subarachnoid space (aOR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.30-4.91, P = 0.005), and ventricles (aOR = 4.58, 95% CI 1.33-15.80, P = 0.016). The HDA score demonstrated a strong dose-response relationship with outcome risk, with scores ≤ 3 indicating low risk (< 10% probability) of severe mass effect and a high negative predictive value (88.8%). An integrated model (model 2) incorporating HDA features, admission blood glucose, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and ASPECTS significantly outperformed a baseline clinical model (model 1) [area under the curve (AUC) 0.801 vs. 0.737, P < 0.001], showing high specificity (81.3%). Model performance was maintained in external validation (AUC 0.786) and in the contrast-staining subgroup (AUC 0.808).

conclusionsA simple, location-specific HDA score, especially when integrated into a clinical prediction model, effectively identifies patients at high risk for severe mass effect after thrombectomy. This tool enables early risk stratification and may guide timely intensive care management.

Indexed as

Brain EdemaDecompressive CraniectomyIschemic StrokeOutcome Assessment, Health CareThrombectomyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCTEdemaHyperdense areasStrokeThrombectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.