ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Probabilistic modeling of the semantic fluency task with extended Markov networks.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Semantic verbal fluency tasks (SFT) provide a window into the structure and dynamics of the mental lexicon by eliciting word sequences guided primarily by semantic associations. We propose a probabilistic framework that models SFT as censored random walks on semantic networks, extended with pseudo-nodes to account for local and global jumps. This representation enables the integration of associative retrieval and sudden resets, capturing both clustering and switching processes. To assess model quality, we define a suite of complementary metrics-global likelihood, frequency likelihood, and bigram relevance-that evaluate not only overall fit but also the distributional properties of word associations. Using a dataset of 677 lists in the category "clothing," we benchmark existing techniques against our proposed BIGRAM-CN model, which combines statistical constraints with empirical frequencies of word-to-word transitions. Results show that BIGRAM-CN avoids overfitting, generalizes across training and test data, and synthesizes realistic lists more accurately than prior approaches. This work advances computational models of lexical retrieval and offers practical tools for comparing populations, categories, and cognitive profiles in both linguistic and psychological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.