ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
An online tomographic sediment trap for high-resolution environmental monitoring.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sediment trapping is a well-established method for obtaining information on sedimentation flux and composition in aquatic environments. Passive sediment traps typically have a collection period of several months to a year, while autonomous traps with revolving wheels can achieve a daily time resolution. However, these devices are often costly, require laborious maintenance, and have high power consumption, which limits their use in remote field locations. This study presents a novel, ultra-high-resolution (hourly temporal resolution) sediment trap based on optical tomography that enables continuous online monitoring of sediment flux. Laboratory validation demonstrated a high volumetric calibration accuracy, with a mean measurement error of ± 0.6 mL (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.