Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42174161›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2026

The Social Role of Plastic Surgery in the LGBTQIA+ Community: A Literature Review.

Mauro Barone, Paolo Persichetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mauro BaroneFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. drmaurobarone@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1439-5686
Paolo PersichettiFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPlastic surgery has historically played a transformative role in the LGBTQIA+ community, particularly for transgender individuals seeking congruence between physical appearance and gender identity. From early clandestine operations to modern gender-affirming interventions such as genital reconstruction, chest contouring, facial surgeries, and body sculpting, these procedures now constitute recognized standards of care. Beyond physical transformation, they also carry profound psychological and social implications-improving quality of life, mental health, and societal integration. MATERIAL AND

methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted on PubMed to evaluate the social role of plastic surgery across the LGBTQIA+ spectrum. Keywords included "gender-affirming surgery," "transgender quality of life," "LGBTQ cosmetic surgery," and "intersex surgery." Over 40 peer-reviewed articles published primarily within the last 15 years were selected, spanning systematic reviews, cohort studies, case series, and qualitative research. A PRISMA flow diagram was used to track study selection, and a tabular synthesis categorized findings by surgical domain and psychosocial outcome.

resultsFindings reveal overwhelmingly positive outcomes associated with gender-affirming surgeries. Genital reconstruction reduces gender dysphoria and improves emotional and sexual well-being with a regret rate below 1%. Chest surgeries-particularly top surgery in transmasculine patients-show satisfaction rates exceeding 90%. Facial feminization is especially impactful in mitigating social misgendering and enhancing self-perception. Adjunct procedures such as body contouring and voice surgery contribute to further gender congruence. However, literature also highlights ethical controversies surrounding non-consensual intersex surgeries and a growing, underexplored trend in cosmetic procedures among gay men, often influenced by sociocultural pressures.

conclusionsPlastic surgery in LGBTQIA+ care transcends aesthetics; it is a tool of identity affirmation and social empowerment. While clinical outcomes are largely positive, disparities in access and gaps in long-term data remain. Continued research, equitable healthcare policies, and surgeon training in culturally competent care are essential to ensure that surgical interventions serve as inclusive instruments of health equity and dignity for all members of the LGBTQIA+ community. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Gender-Affirming SurgeryPlastic Surgery ProceduresQuality of LifeSexual and Gender MinoritiesSurgery, PlasticTransgender PersonsFemaleGender IdentityHumansMaleGayGenderGender affirmingLesbianLGBTLGBTQIA+Quality of lifeSex reassignmentTransTransgender

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.