ArticleScientific reports2026
A comparative ML approach to classify Lupinus species using VIS-NIR spectral data from whole seeds and various data transformation techniques and resampling methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing interest in the cultivation and utilization of Lupinus species is driven by their nutritional value and potential for sustainable agriculture. However, the non-destructive taxonomic classification of Lupinus species from whole seeds spectral data remains scarcely explored. In this study, five machine learning classifiers were comparatively evaluated for discriminating seven Lupinus species using visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) spectral data, in both reflectance and absorbance modes, acquired from seeds of the official active collection of the CICYTEX Germplasm Bank. The dataset was characterized by marked class imbalance. Model performance was assessed using raw spectra and four preprocessing strategies (including three hybrid combinations) combined with six resampling methods and a no-resampling baseline. Two validation approaches were applied: an 80/20 train-test split and stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Across both spectral domains and validation schemes, Random Forest and Support Vector Classification achieved the best overall performance, with F1 scores above 94%, and AUC, accuracy and precision values above 97%. Logistic Regression also showed substantial improvements when hybrid preprocessing techniques were applied. Cross-validation confirmed the robustness and generalization ability of the best-performing models. These findings support the use of VIS-NIR spectroscopy combined with machine learning as a rapid, objective, and non-destructive framework for Lupinus species discrimination in imbalanced germplasm datasets. This approach may assist taxonomic identification, germplasm management, and the preliminary screening of promising materials for breeding programs, although further validation under independent environmental and acquisition conditions is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.