ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic isolation forest for anomaly detection in post-PCI myocardial infarction patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with myocardial infarction require continuous monitoring of multiple laboratory parameters after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but assessment of their dynamic changes and of whether they deviate from the typical recovery trajectory still relies largely on clinical experience, and objective methods remain lacking. This study included 183 patients with myocardial infarction who underwent PCI, constructed fixed three-time-point windows, used blinded expert review as the reference, compared dynamic isolation forest (DIF) with other unsupervised methods, and conducted an external supportive prognostic analysis in MIMIC-IV. The results showed that DIF had the best agreement with expert ratings (Spearman's ρ = 0.585; Kendall's τ = 0.452), with an AUC of 0.859, and overall outperformed the other methods; the MIMIC-IV analysis showed that higher DIF anomaly scores were associated with an increased risk of death. DIF can be used to identify abnormal recovery windows after PCI that deviate from the typical recovery trajectory and may have potential for risk stratification, although its clinical utility still requires further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.