ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Deep learning predicts stent implantation in borderline coronary lesions from angiography.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate evaluation of coronary intermediate lesions (50-70% stenosis) is essential for stent decision-making, yet conventional angiography remains subjective and adjunctive tests like FFR are often invasive or costly. In this retrospective multicenter study of 1298 patients, we developed an attention-enhanced deep learning model using Improved_EfficientNet with a Convolutional Block Attention Module to predict stent necessity directly from coronary angiography images. The model utilized multimodal labels from FFR, IVUS, and OCT as reference standards during training. In internal validation, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.976 and an F1-score of 0.971. External validation across independent institutions demonstrated robust performance with an accuracy of 0.807 and an AUC of 0.897. Grad-CAM visualization confirmed that the model focuses on clinically relevant stenotic regions, showing high alignment with expert interpretations. These results suggest that the proposed model can effectively integrate anatomical and functional information to provide real-time decision support, potentially reducing the need for invasive adjunctive testing and enhancing precision in interventional cardiology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.