Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42174117›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Impact of nurse-led postoperative education on health outcomes following endovascular aortic repair: a randomized trial.

Johan Nilsson, Joakim Nordanstig, Mona Ringdal, Per Skoog, Monica E Pettersson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06986252 (Effect of Nurse-led Education on Health, Quality of Life and Sexual Health for Patients Undergoing Endovascular Intervention for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06986252 naterminatednot on this map

Effect of Nurse-led Education on Health, Quality of Life and Sexual Health for Patients Undergoing Endovascular Intervention for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

TypeinterventionalSponsorGöteborg UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled51ConditionsAbdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA)ArmsConsultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johan NilssonInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden. johan.nilsson.4@gu.se.
Joakim NordanstigInstitute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mona RingdalInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Per SkoogInstitute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Monica E PetterssonInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 40530, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to investigate the health effects of an education-based intervention performed at a nurse-led clinic, for patients who underwent endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Fifty-four adult patients were randomized to the intervention group (n = 26) or the control group (n = 28). The control group received standard care, and the intervention group received standard care alongside two consultations at a specialist surgical nurse-led clinic. The consultations focused on individual motivational support and education about abdominal aortic aneurysm disease. Data was collected prior to surgery (baseline) and at one, six, and 12 months postoperatively for each group. Outcomes of interest included participants' responses to the Health Education Impact Questionnaire, responses to the EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire, and responses to four complementary items specific to the scope of this study. Both groups reported overall high ratings of perceived health throughout the study period. While there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups, the control group showed a substantial improvement in perceived understanding of their diagnosis over time. This randomized controlled trial did not find any significant health benefits as compared to standard treatment.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (19/05/2025 NCT06986252). Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalEndovascular Aneurysm RepairEndovascular ProceduresPatient Education as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeAortic aneurysmEndovascular treatmentNurse-led clinicNursingPatient educationQuality of lifeRecovery

Identifiers

PMID42174117
PMCPMC13197393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.