ArticleScientific reports2026
Countermovement jump peak force discriminates low hip bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eccentric Countermovement Jump Mechanics Are Associated with Bone Properties in Physically Inactive Early Postmenopausal Women.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postmenopausal women are at increased risk of low bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporotic fractures, yet access to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains limited in many settings. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of countermovement jump (CMJ)-derived variables for identifying low BMD in postmenopausal women. In this diagnostic accuracy study, 123 postmenopausal women underwent DXA assessment at the lumbar spine and total hip and performed CMJ testing on a force plate to obtain jump height, peak force, and peak power. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to assess accuracy. Overall, 21.1% of participants had low BMD. CMJ variables showed low accuracy for the lumbar spine and when sites were analyzed jointly (AUC < 0.70). In contrast, peak force (AUC = 0.78) and peak power (AUC = 0.72) demonstrated moderate accuracy for identifying low total hip BMD. A cutoff ≤ 1101.1 N for peak force yielded 66.7% sensitivity and 91.2% specificity. After adjustment for age and years since menopause, only peak force remained significantly associated with low hip BMD (OR = 17.6; p = 0.001). These findings suggest that CMJ-derived peak force may serve as a preliminary screening tool to identify postmenopausal women at risk of low hip BMD, however, the proposed cutoff is exploratory and requires external validation before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.