ArticleScientific reports2026
Gender differences in the association between physical frailty and cognitive function among older adults: A cross-sectional study in rural Guizhou, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To examine gender differences in the association between physical frailty and cognitive function among older adults in rural China. A total of 1,654 older adults (41.9% male) aged 60 years and above from rural areas of Guizhou Province, China, participated in the study. Cognitive function was assessed using the Chinese-adapted Mini-Mental State Examination (C-MMSE), and frailty status was determined based on Fried's frailty criteria. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between frailty and cognitive function, with sex-stratified analyses performed to explore gender-specific differences in these associations. Females exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of frailty (12.9% vs. 9.2%) and lower mean C-MMSE scores (19 vs. 24) compared to males (All P < 0.001). After adjustment, frailty was inversely associated with C-MMSE in both sexes.Among the five frailty phenotypes, only low physical activity (β =-1.156; 95% CI: -2.019 to -0.293; P = 0.002) and self-reported exhaustion or fatigue (β = -0.963; 95% CI:-1.658 to -0.269; P = 0.005) were significantly associated with lower C-MMSE scores in females. In women, the presence of any one or more frailty phenotypes was linked to cognitive decline, whereas in men, cognitive impairment was observed only when three or more frailty phenotypes were present. According to results from the study of older adults in rural Guizhou, there is a gender difference in the relationship between frailty and cognitive function, with women having a stronger association. These findings suggest that women's cognitive function is more susceptible to the effects of frailty, while more prospective research is needed to confirm this conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.