ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of construction progress of smart highway: a Bayesian network model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate progress control is essential for intelligent highway construction, where the integration of advanced electromechanical equipment, digital technologies, and complex construction interfaces makes traditional progress evaluation methods insufficient. To address this issue, this study proposes a progress evaluation framework tailored to the characteristics of intelligent highway projects. Based on the analysis of project progress factors and construction management requirements, a multi-dimensional indicator system is established to capture both schedule performance and technology-specific construction characteristics. The proposed framework combines expert judgment and quantitative evaluation to support a more comprehensive assessment of construction progress. Using actual project data from an intelligent highway construction case, the model is applied to evaluate the progress status of different construction stages and identify key factors influencing schedule deviation. The results show that the proposed method can effectively reflect the real progress condition of intelligent highway construction and provide actionable support for project managers in making timely corrective decisions. Compared with conventional progress evaluation approaches, the proposed framework is more suitable for intelligent highway projects because it accounts for their technological complexity and management characteristics. This study offers a practical evaluation tool for progress monitoring and contributes to improving the precision and adaptability of intelligent highway construction management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.