ArticleBritish dental journal2026
Prevention first - modelling evidence-based prevention with the dental team for children in England.
Article in British dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The United Kingdom has a diverse, professionalised dental workforce. Dental caries remains a prevalent disease, with significant inequalities. New ways of using our dental care professionals need to be considered in delivering preventive care to all patients.Methods Data sources for an operational research optimisation model included child (under 18 years) population demography; National Health Service (NHS) data; epidemiological data on dental caries experience from three national surveys; and preventive guidance identified from Delivering Better Oral Health V4. Data for care delivery included timings were informed by previous research and NHS working patterns. The Linear Programming model was developed for six different dental skill mix scenarios.Results Skill mix utilisation reduces time and workforce numbers, when compared with a single member of the dental team providing the preventive treatment plan. The workforce capacity ranged from 409-7,991 for dentists, 6,002-17,500 for dental therapists and 979-4,083 for extended duties dental nurses. Modelling suggests that a combination of all three dental team members provides the most efficient skill mix for this care delivery.Conclusion The development of this operational research model suggests the potential for skill mix in delivering evidence-informed, risk-based prevention of oral and dental disease in children in England in dental settings and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.