ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated orbital wall fracture detection and severity classification of ocular injuries using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orbital fractures are frequently encountered in maxillofacial trauma and can be associated with severe globe injuries (SGI). Accurate and timely diagnosis is critical to prevent long-term complications, yet subtle fractures and soft tissue injuries may be overlooked. Recent advances in artificial intelligence offer promising tools to support clinical decision-making in acute settings. We collected CT images from 250 eyes with orbital wall fractures treated at a single center between May 2020 and May 2023. From CT scans of included subjects, a dataset of 18,000 annotated orbital CT scan slices was used, with segmentation preprocessing based on a U-Net framework. Two supervised convolutional neural network (CNN) classifiers were trained on axial and coronal CT images of the orbit. The first model (FxDetectCNN) was trained to detect orbital fractures, while the second model (SGIDetectCNN) was trained to classify injury severity as non-severe or severe. The models' performance was compared with annotations by two experienced ophthalmologists. The fracture detection model achieved an overall accuracy of 81%, with 86% sensitivity and 76% specificity. The SGI estimation model achieved 64% accuracy, with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 48%, compared with expert annotation, which reached a maximum accuracy of 59.5% for SGI estimation. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of CNN models in detecting fractures and classifying the severity of ocular injuries from CT scans. These tools can assist emergency physicians in triaging patients and may serve as valuable decision-support systems in emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.