ArticleScientific reports2026
Web questionnaire survey of physicians and patients on the side effects of trifluridine/tipiracil.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is effective for advanced colorectal and gastric cancers; however, limited real-world data exist on physician and patient experiences with non-hematologic toxicities such as nausea, anorexia, and fatigue. We investigated the real-world incidence and management of these side effects from both perspectives. A web-based questionnaire survey was conducted among physicians experienced in prescribing FTD/TPI and patients with colorectal or gastric cancer who were receiving or had received these medications. Patients reported non-hematologic toxicities‒fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting‒more frequently and earlier than physicians anticipated. Fatigue and anorexia were the most distressing side effects for patients and the most challenging for physicians to manage. Discrepancies existed between physicians and patients regarding communication and side-effect management strategies. Although nausea and vomiting were manageable with antiemetics, clear management methods for fatigue and anorexia have not been established. Patients valued detailed explanations about medication administration, non-hematologic side effects, and costs more than physicians recognized. In FTD/TPI therapy, a discrepancy exists between physicians' and patients' perceptions of non-hematologic toxicities, which may pose challenges in effective symptom management. Symptoms such as fatigue and anorexia appear to be less adequately addressed, highlighting the need for continued efforts to improve management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.