ArticleScientific reports2026
Plastinated sectional anatomy applied in CT and MRI studies of the body of the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) is a wild canid with a wide geographic distribution and a high propensity for roadkill in Brazil. Accurate diagnosis and appropriate clinical-surgical management require in-depth anatomical knowledge of the species, which is still limited for C. thous. This study aimed to correlate the sectional anatomy of C. thous through plastination, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following the anatomical principle of metamerism to build the vertebrate body. Four animals underwent CT and MRI scans, and the images were stored in DICOM format. Then, the specimens were subjected to silicone plastination at a cold temperature using the forced impregnation technique in four stages: fixation, dehydration, impregnation, and curing. Additionally, three-dimensional rendering and multiplanar virtual dissections were performed to identify and describe the anatomical and syntopic correlations. Furthermore, the transverse slices of plastinated specimens were used to describe the anatomical details of the head, neck, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. This study showed that correlating the plastinated sections with CT and MRI images may enhance anatomical knowledge and the reading and interpretation of imaging examinations in wild species that lack comprehensive anatomical or clinical-surgical information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.