ArticleScientific reports2026
Reporting and data systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy with findings of a user adoption survey.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard operation for symptomatic cholelithiasis with high incidence (7.5%) and complication (2%) rates. Pre-/intra-/post-intervention information in the form of multimodal data is recorded in various unstructured formats across different centres. The need to archive and retrieve them across centres motivates the need for the development of standardized Reporting And Data Systems (RADS). This study aims to develop a comprehensive set of multimodality-correlated RADS for LC. The present work has developed a set of RADS, which records pre-operative findings, ultrasonography findings, operating theatre findings, procedure video findings, and post-operative follow-up. Additionally, a Surgeon-specific RADS is also proposed to record the Surgeon's skill. A cohort of 100 Surgeons with varying expertise in LC have reviewed the RADS, with 73% agreeing that the LC-RADS effectively record relevant data and 77% preferring to use them regularly in surgical practice. LC-RADS is a center-agnostic proforma that standardizes data collection in surgical interventions for enhancing the quality of patient care management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.