Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42173948›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Design of an ultra-compact and high-performance antenna for private 5G applications.

Youjin Han, Jae-Geun Lee, Byung Kuon Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youjin HanDepartment of Intelligent Semiconductors, Soongsil University, Seoul, 06978, South Korea.
Jae-Geun LeeDepartment of Intelligent Semiconductors, Soongsil University, Seoul, 06978, South Korea.
Byung Kuon AhnDepartment of Intelligent Semiconductors, Soongsil University, Seoul, 06978, South Korea. abg6312@ssu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an ultra-compact and high-performance antenna for Private 5G applications. Private 5G applications, which provide customized coverage, face the challenge of simultaneously achieving bandwidths exceeding 100 MHz, stable gain, and miniaturization. In general, small antennas have a trade-off between physical size and bandwidth and gain, which limits their practical applications. In order to address this issue, this study adopted a step-by-step design approach. After setting the conventional patch antenna as the reference structure, miniaturization was induced by maximizing edge deformation to extend the effective surface current path. The bandwidth reduction caused by the current density imbalance due to edge deformation was effectively improved by combining an aperture coupled feed and a defected ground structure. In addition, symmetrical slots are inserted at the top of the patch to further extend the current path and achieve additional miniaturization. A prototype antenna was fabricated to experimentally validate the performance of the proposed antenna. The measured 10-dB impedance bandwidth is 4.70-4.83 GHz (2.73%) with a peak gain of 5.23 dBi, while the electrical diagonal length is 0.19[Formula: see text] at 4.77 GHz. Compared with previous studies, the proposed antenna achieves a well-balanced performance of miniaturization, bandwidth, and gain, resulting in a competitive figure of merit. The proposed ultra-compact and high-performance antenna has practical applications in Private 5G with significant size constraints, and the step-by-step design procedure can provide useful guidelines for designing small antennas in other frequency bands through appropriate sizing and re-optimization.

Identifiers

PMID42173948
PMCPMC13402688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.