ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026
Molecular maps of diseases from omics data and network embeddings.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying disease-relevant proteins and pathways remains a fundamental challenge in understanding disease mechanisms and supporting therapeutic development. While omics analyses can provide valuable insights, they typically consider each gene/protein separately rather than at the level of biological systems. This can be addressed by combining the omics data with protein networks. We integrate disease-specific omics data with a universal functional association network from STRING, which we represent using node2vec embedding. This way, we constructed disease maps for seven diseases spanning inflammatory, oncological, neurological, and vascular diseases based on genetics, transcriptomics, somatic mutation, and proteomics data. Compared to omics analysis alone, the use of a simple linear model on top of network embedding enabled us to identify 2-4 times as many known disease-relevant proteins at the same specificity. Clustering of the resulting disease maps revealed both functional modules shared by many diseases, such as inflammatory pathways and cancer hallmarks, and disease-specific modules, such as keratinization in atopic dermatitis and extracellular matrix remodeling in aortic aneurysm. Together, these results highlight the value of protein network embedding when analyzing omics data to understand diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.