Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42173898›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Operando X-ray scattering reveals ordering-mediated solidification in additive manufacturing.

Lin Gao, Kyle Mumm, Zhongshu Ren, Zhou Yu, Xingyang Li, Chihpin Andrew Chuang, Tao Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lin GaoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. lgao9@ua.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-7354
Kyle MummDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9930-3831
Zhongshu RenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4662-2422
Zhou YuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Xingyang LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Chihpin Andrew ChuangX-ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0295-381X
Tao SunDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. taosun@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4881-9774

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DMR-2427686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solidification in fusion-based metal additive manufacturing (AM) occurs under non-equilibrium conditions, often producing microstructures that deviate from classical theories, such as refined grains with high twin density arising from abnormal columnar-to-equiaxed transition (CET). While such feature has been linked to liquid atomic orderings, direct mechanistic evidence has been lacking. Here, we perform operando synchrotron X-ray total scattering measurement with rapid pair distribution function (PDF) analysis to probe atomic structures in AM melt pools. We resolve the evolution of short- and medium-range orderings and connect their selective consumption to distinct solidification pathways in Inconel 718 and other alloys. Our findings not only confirm the importance of icosahedral clusters in controlling solidification behavior, but also suggest a distinct nucleation and growth pathway responsible for abnormal CET. This insight offers opportunities for alloy design and microstructure control in metal AM.

Identifiers

PMID42173898
PMCPMC13385772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.