Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42173871›Full record

ReviewSignal transduction and targeted therapy2026

The in vivo revolution in CAR-T therapy medicinal products: challenges and regulatory prospects.

Jiaqi Lu, Jing Cui, Jing Dong, Liping Yan, Xue Wang, Di Zhou, Shuang Lu, Wei Wei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiaqi LuCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China.
Jing CuiCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China.
Jing DongCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China.
Liping YanCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China.
Xue WangCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China.
Di ZhouCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China.
Shuang LuCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China.
Wei WeiCenter for Drug Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China. weiw@cde.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, a groundbreaking advancement in cancer immunotherapy, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in treating hematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases. However, conventional ex vivo CAR-T therapy medicinal products face multiple limitations, including complex manufacturing processes, high production costs, and challenges in quality control and risk management. In recent years, the emergence of in vivo CAR-T therapy medicinal products using viral vector or lipid nanoparticle platforms has provided a promising new direction by simplifying manufacturing, enhancing scalability, lowering costs, and increasing accessibility, though it may introduce elevated risks such as off-target effects and immunogenicity. From a regulatory perspective, this article reviews the progress, technological strengths, and regulatory landscape of in vivo CAR-T therapy medicinal products. We analyze their potential benefits in manufacturability, scalability, and discuss challenges including quality control, safety risks, and mitigation strategies in drug development. We propose adaptive regulatory strategies together with early regulatory engagement and international coordination to accelerate the clinical translation and standardized use of this emerging modality.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsHumansReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID42173871
PMCPMC13197399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.