ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Galvanic vestibular stimulation reveals disruption of ipsilesional brainstem pathways in hemiparetic stroke survivors.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Galvanic vestibular stimulation reveals disruption of ipsilesional brainstem pathways in hemiparetic stroke survivors.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The spatiotemporal structure of muscle coordination emerges from the collaboration and competition among cortical, brainstem and spinal pathways onto motor neuron pools, each continuously shaped by task demands, limb position and descending tract integrity. Here, we used galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) to investigate whether brainstem vestibular output is disrupted in stroke survivors with right hemiparesis (n = 14) compared with age-matched control subjects (n = 14). We estimated this via intermuscular coherence among neck and arm muscles during both rest and a reaching-like (i.e., reaching) movement with the shoulder in neutral and abducted positions, each with no stimulation, sham stimulation or GVS. Previous work showed that young adults exhibit increased coherence between neck muscles with GVS at rest, as do our control subjects. Surprisingly, we saw the same pattern in stroke survivors only on their paretic side, with reduced coherence in their non-paretic side. During reaching, the paretic side did not show changes in coherence between arm or neck muscles, in comparison to control subjects, with and without GVS, and importantly, even lower coherence with the abducted shoulder. Given that GVS did not exacerbate intermuscular coherence in any muscle pair during the reaching tasks and that coherence was even reduced during shoulder abduction, our findings provide evidence to exclude increased brainstem vestibular output as a dominant contributor to pathological synergies during voluntary movement following stroke. In addition, the decreased coherence between neck muscles of the non-paretic side during GVS at rest suggests changes in ipsilesional brainstem vestibular output. This highlights opportunities to consider unexplored contralesional brainstem-spinal pathways, in addition to downregulated ipsilesional vestibular projections, in neurorehabilitation strategies following stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.