ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2026
Clinic-based burden of glaucoma among Sahrawi refugees in the Tindouf camps.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the clinic-based frequency of glaucoma among Sahrawi refugees attending humanitarian ophthalmology missions in the Tindouf camps (Algeria), to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with glaucoma and to contextualise the clinic-based frequency of other ophthalmic diseases. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We conducted a clinic-based cross-sectional study among Sahrawi refugees during Médicos del Mundo ophthalmology missions. All participants underwent a standardised ophthalmological examination including targeted history, visual acuity assessment, slit-lamp biomicroscopy and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. Glaucoma diagnosis relied on structural optic nerve head assessment and elevated IOP, with independent confirmation by a second ophthalmologist. Age-standardised and sex-standardised clinic-based frequencies were calculated using camp population demographics. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with glaucoma.
resultsA total of 900 symptomatic care-seeking individuals were examined (56% men; median age 70 years). Overall clinic-based glaucoma frequency was 13.3% (95% CI 11.1% to 15.5%), representing the main disease of interest. After standardisation, the estimated clinic-based frequency was 6.7% (95% CI 3.8% to 9.7%). Older age was independently associated with glaucoma (adjusted OR per year 1.02; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.03; p=0.003). Inverse associations with cataract and keratopathy, likely reflected selection patterns and diagnostic overshadowing. Cataract was the most common coexisting diagnosis (59.8%), followed by keratopathy (9.1%) and retinopathy (3.4%). Among participants, 37.8% (n=340) had severe bilateral visual impairment, and 40.9% (n=368) had monocular vision; 17.5% (n=60/340) of those with bilateral impairment were blind from glaucoma.
conclusionsGlaucoma represents a substantial clinic-based burden among symptomatic Sahrawi refugees attending humanitarian missions, with a high proportion of irreversible visual loss. Other ophthalmic conditions were common but functioned as coexisting causes of visual impairment in this care-seeking sample. These findings highlight the need for pragmatic, context-appropriate strategies for opportunistic glaucoma detection and continuity of care in refugee settings, acknowledging limitations including the non-probabilistic, mission-based sampling and absence of visual-field testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.