Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42173256›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2026

The relationship between myocardial and hepatic T1 relaxometry on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes late after tetralogy of Fallot repair.

Ayako Ishikita, Lais Marques, Subin Thomas, Isaac Begun, Jacques DuPlessis, Romina DSouza, Soshun Asakawa, Gauri R Karur, Kate Hanneman, Darren A Yuen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. T1 mapping in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: A marker of fibrosis or a mirror of hemodynamics?Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ayako IshikitaDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Lais MarquesDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Subin ThomasDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Isaac BegunDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jacques DuPlessisDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Romina DSouzaDivision of Cardiology, Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Soshun AsakawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Gauri R KarurDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kate HannemanDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Darren A YuenSt. Michael's Hospital Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rajiv R ChaturvediDivision of Cardiology, Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark K FriedbergDivision of Cardiology, Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Slava EpelmanDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
S Lucy RocheDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rachel M WaldDivision of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Cardiology, Labatt Family Heart Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: rachel.wald@uhn.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can estimate diffuse myocardial fibrosis using native T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) quantification.

objectivesThis study aimed to explore associations between, and prognostic value of, myocardial and hepatic parametric imaging measurements after tetralogy of Fallot repair (rTOF).

methodsAdults with rTOF were prospectively enrolled along with healthy controls. Patients were categorized by residual hemodynamic load (pulmonary stenosis and/or pulmonary regurgitation). Available clinical data were recorded at study entry. Myocardial and hepatic native T1 were measured and ECV was calculated from pre/post-contrast T1 maps. The primary outcome was a composite of death, resuscitated sudden death, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), VT requiring invasive therapy, or heart failure requiring hospital admission. Multivariable models, adjusted for age and sex, examined the association between CMR measures and adverse cardiovascular events.

resultsIn total, n=181 patients (56% male; median age 33 years [IQR 26-47]) and 20 healthy age and sex-matched controls were studied. Hepatic and myocardial ECV measures correlated modestly (r=0.31, p<0.001). Hepatic native T1 was higher in rTOF patients as compared with controls (572±102 versus 529±12 msec, p=0.006) with statistically significant differences between hemodynamic load type (p=0.044). Right ventricular (RV) native T1 was increased in rTOF as compared with controls (1078±43 versus 997±43 msec, p<0.001) with a trend towards significant differences when stratified by hemodynamic load (p=0.091). Pathologic late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was seen in the RV in 46% (n=83) and in the left ventricle (LV) in 37% (n=66). At median follow-up 2.05 years (IQR 0.75-2.81), the composite primary outcome occurred in 9% (n=17). Independent predictors of adverse events included RV end-systolic volume (HR 1.43, [95% CI 1.09-1.99], p=0.009), RV native T1 (HR 1.15, [95% CI 1.07-1.25], p<0.001), and LV LGE (HR 3.18, [95% CI 1.07-10.23], p=0.038); hepatic parametric imaging was not associated with outcome.

conclusionIn rTOF, myocardial and hepatic parametric imaging measures were modestly correlated and were increased as compared with controls. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in the RV (native T1) and replacement fibrosis in the LV (LGE) were independently associated with major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, although hepatic relaxometry measures were not. These findings warrant further validation in larger populations with longer follow-up.

Indexed as

fibrosislivermyocardiumrelaxometryT1 mapping

Identifiers

PMID42173256
PMCPMC13634381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.