ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2026
A revised model for PHF20L1 Tudor function: DNA binding overrides methylation selectivity on nucleosomes.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant homeodomain finger protein 20-like protein 1 (PHF20L1) is a methyl-lysine reader that regulates chromatin remodeling and transcription via its tandem Tudor and PHD finger domains. Here, we characterize the selectivity of these Tudor domains using biophysical and structural approaches. Quantitative fluorescence polarization (FP) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) reveal that Tudor1 binds to both mono- and di-methylated H3K36 and H4K20, with a modest preference for H3K36me1, whereas Tudor2 is highly specific for H4K20me2. Their tandem arrangement enhances affinity for methylated H3K36 through cooperative binding. The crystal structure of Tudor1 in complex with H3K36me1 reveals the basis for its preference: a deep, narrow aromatic cage formed by Y24, Y29, F47, W50, and Y54 accommodates the mono-methylammonium group, while D23 contributes a critical hydrogen bond that stabilizes the interaction. Mutations in this cage abolish H3K36me1 binding, and mutation of corresponding cage-forming residues (W97A/Y103A, based on our solved apo Tudor2 structure) disrupts Tudor2 recognition of H4K20me2. Structural comparison across Tudor family readers for H3K36me and H4K20me further indicates that the number and orientation of acidic residues within the otherwise hydrophobic aromatic cages fine-tune selectivity among methyl-lysine states. Unexpectedly, nucleosome-binding assays reveal that the tandem Tudor domains bind to DNA with high affinity and lose methylation selectivity, contrasting sharply with the peptide-level results. Thus, our findings revise the mechanistic framework for PHF20L1 chromatin engagement: from a selective methyl-lysine reader to a high-affinity DNA-binding module on nucleosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.