ArticlePoultry science2026
First report of seropositivity to pathogenic Leptospira in backyard hens: potential poultry health issue and zoonotic risk.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leptospirosis, a bacterial zoonotic disease of worldwide distribution, has not been extensively studied in birds, although leptospiral infection has been described in these animals. In this study, 62 backyard hens were sampled in three suburban areas near the city of Puerto Montt, southern Chile. A panel of eight serogroups and serovars of pathogenic Leptospira were tested using the Microscopic Agglutination Test to determine the seropositivity rate, serogroups, and serovars causing serological reactions, and to quantify antibody titers. A seropositivity rate of 51.61% (32/62) (95% Confidence Interval= 39.17%-64.05%) was estimated, with reactivity detected most frequently for the Sejroe (serovar Hardjo) (34.4%; n = 11), followed by Autumnalis (serovar Autumnalis) (21.9%; n = 7), Pomona (serovar Pomona) (9.4%; n = 3), and Canicola (serovar Canicola) (3.1%; n = 1) serogroups. Of the animals that tested positive, 53.1% reacted to a single serogroup, while 25.0% reacted to four different serogroups; 12.5% reacted to three serogroups, and 9.4% reacted to two serogroups. Coagglutinations were present in 31.3% (n = 10) of the seropositive samples, with Hardjo/Pomona/Tarassovi/Autumnalis (40.0%; n = 4) being the most frequent combination. Antibody titers ranged from 1:100 to 1:3200, with 1:100 being the highest proportion. The high seropositivity rate, presence of anti-Leptospira antibodies, and cross-reactivity among serogroups/serovars in the sampled hens indicate exposure to the bacteria and reveal an unknown potential poultry health issue and a zoonotic risk concern that require awareness given the widespread practice of poultry farming worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.