SynthesisEBioMedicine2026
Paediatric DNA methylation profile scores: a systematic review and open-source atlas.
Synthesis in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protein epigenetic scores derived in neonatal saliva as biomarkers of childhood cognition.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methylation profile scores (MPSs) have emerged as a useful tool to index exposures, biological states, or disease-related patterns, by aggregating information across many DNA methylation (DNAm) sites into a single score per individual. Although most MPSs to date have been trained and validated in adults, their use in early life (<18 years) is rapidly gaining momentum, as more cohorts profile DNAm during development, offering a window on exposures and vulnerability before disease onset. Here we systematically review early-life MPS studies (n = 119), covering 828 MPSs that span a wide range of exposures and traits. Overall, studies show substantial heterogeneity in design and reporting. Also, studies frequently apply MPSs trained in data from mismatched age groups, tissues, array or platforms, and ancestries, which may influence MPS performance. To address these limitations, we introduce DEMETRA (indepthlab-demetra.share.connect.posit.cloud), a searchable atlas of early-life MPSs to help users identify and select scores best suited to their study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.