ArticleGenetics2026
Genomic islands in Wolbachia prophages drive amplification and diversification of cytoplasmic incompatibility genes in Culex pipiens.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highlighting the genetics of natural and synthetic selfish elements in a special GENETICS and G3 series.Genetics · 2026Article
- Highlighting the genetics of natural and synthetic selfish elements in a special GENETICS and G3 series.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Calibrating and documenting host-switching and evolution of incompatibility loci for two closely related Wolbachia clades.Genetics · 2026Article
- Extensive mobilome dynamics in a widespread endosymbiont: long read metagenomics reveal dimeric plasmids and highly fragmented prophages in Wolbachia from Culex pipiens.Research square · 2026Article
- Calibrating and documenting host-switching and evolution of incompatibility loci for two closely relatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wolbachia are maternally inherited endosymbiotic bacteria widespread among arthropods. They manipulate their host reproduction to enhance their prevalence in host populations. The most common manipulation is cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI), which causes embryonic death in crosses between infected males and uninfected females, or between individuals carrying incompatible Wolbachia strains. CI patterns are highly complex in the mosquito Culex pipiens, where the causal genes cidA and cidB are amplified and diversified, forming a "cid repertoire" within each Wolbachia wPip genome. Despite their central role in CI, the genomic mechanisms underlying such cid amplification and diversification remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap is largely due to the difficulty of assembling wPip's genomes due to highly repeated genes and mobile elements, especially in WO prophages. Here, we directly annotated Illumina-corrected Nanopore sequences to investigate the genomic flanking context of cid genes in 3 distinct wPip lineages. We assembled WO prophage regions of substantial length containing the entire cid repertoire previously described in these bacterial lineages. Within these WO regions, cid genes are consistently embedded in modular and rearrangeable islands composed of MutL, rnhA, and small mobile elements, all displaying hyperconserved nucleotide identity across islands. These genomic islands are probably drivers for major rearrangement and recombination events responsible for the amplification and diversification of cidwPip genes within and between the wPip genomes, leading to CI complexity in C. pipiens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.