ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
eFEL: electrophysiology feature extraction library.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuropathic pain drives time-dependent reorganization of corticostriatal circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationElectrophysiological recordings are essential in experimental and computational neuroscience, providing insights into neuronal excitability and network behaviour. Extracting features such as action potential thresholds, widths, and firing patterns is conceptually straightforward, but in practice it is complicated by heterogeneous datasets and software environments, which hinder reproducibility and interoperability. A standardized, efficient, and portable framework is needed to ensure consistent analysis across platforms and alignment with community data standards.
resultsWe present the Electrophysiology Feature Extraction Library (eFEL), a cross-platform, open-source library that implements standardized definitions for over 90 electrophysiological features. eFEL combines a high-performance C++ core with a Python interface, supporting customizable feature dependencies, caching, and parallelization. It integrates with community standards such as Neurodata Without Borders and works seamlessly with common electrophysiology formats and simulation environments. Since its initial release in 2015, eFEL has been used in published studies spanning single-cell analysis, model optimization, multimodal fitting, and circuit simulations. eFEL provides a FAIR-compliant, versatile resource for reproducible electrophysiological data analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The eFEL library is publicly available at https://github.com/openbraininstitute/eFEL and the associated study data and scripts have been deposited in Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/records/17241835.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.