Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42172493›Full record

ReviewJournal of gynecologic oncology2026

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: current evidence, limitations, and future perspectives.

Giorgio Bogani, Andreas Obermair, Antonia Testa, Giorgia Gargenese, Valentina Chiappa, Francesco Raspagliesi, Neville Hacker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giorgio BoganiDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy. giorgiobogani@yahoo.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8373-8569
Andreas ObermairThe University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2199-1117
Antonia TestaIRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2217-8726
Giorgia GargeneseUnità di Chirurgia degli Organi Genitali Esterni Femminili, Divisione di Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-5285
Valentina ChiappaDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1811-209X
Francesco RaspagliesiDepartment of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8953-1657
Neville HackerSchool of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-2302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecologic malignancy in which regional lymph node status represents the most powerful prognostic factor and a key determinant of therapeutic strategy. For the past 60 years, bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was the standard approach for staging and disease control. Although effective, this procedure was associated with substantial morbidity, including wound complications, chronic lower limb lymphedema, and long-term impairment of quality of life. In the past 20 years, sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has emerged as a less invasive alternative for selected patients with unifocal, clinically node-negative vulvar tumors less than 4 cm in diameter. Large prospective trials, such as GROINSS-V and GOG-173, demonstrated that sentinel node biopsy is feasible, safe, and significantly reduces postoperative morbidity while maintaining excellent oncologic outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Nevertheless, concerns persist regarding false-negative results, reported in up to 7%-10% of cases in some series, with anecdotal reports of rates up to 27%. Undetected nodal disease represents a missed opportunity for cure, and most patients with an isolated groin recurrence ultimately succumb to their disease. Therefore, the potential benefits of morbidity reduction must be carefully balanced against the risk of undertreatment. This review summarizes the historical evolution of groin management in vulvar cancer, critically appraises the current evidence supporting SLN mapping, and discusses its clinical limitations, patient preferences, and implications for practice. Emphasis is placed on surgical expertise, the importance of ultrastaging, structured surveillance, and ongoing prospective research to achieve the best survival with the lowest morbidity.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyVulvar NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymphadenectomyQuality of LifeRecurrenceSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyVulvar Cancer

Identifiers

PMID42172493
PMCPMC13226064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.