ArticleScience advances2026
Scalable and cost-efficient custom gene library assembly from oligopools.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- iFLinkC-EZ: A scalable and automatable method for the assembly of complex fusion proteins and multi-gene expression constructs based on the iFLinkC framework.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- De-extinction technology and its application to conservation.The Journal of heredity · 2026Review
- Accelerating protein design by scaling experimental characterization.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Amplicon/Protein Bead Display enables quantitativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Evolution-guided engineering of an ancient nitrogenase interface enhances enzyme activity and stability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- uSort-M: Scalable isolation of user-defined sequences from diverse pooled libraries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Synthesis of large single-transcript pathways from oligonucleotide pools: Design of STARBURST, an autobioluminescent reporter.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in metagenomics, deep learning, and generative protein design have enabled broad in silico exploration of sequence space, but experimental characterization is still constrained by the cost and scalability of DNA synthesis. Here, we present OMEGA (Oligo-based Multiplexed Efficient Gene Assembly), a low-cost, accessible method for assembling hundreds to thousands of full-length genes in parallel using standard laboratory techniques. OMEGA computationally fragments target genes into short, high-fidelity Golden Gate-compatible oligonucleotides that can be ordered as a pooled library and assembled across multiplexed subpools. We systematically optimized the number of fragments per gene and orthogonal ligation sites per reaction and determine that OMEGA can assemble up to 2.6-kilobase constructs using as many as 70 Golden Gate sites. To validate the approach, we assembled and functionally screened a library of 810 natural and synthetic green fluorescent protein variants, recovering 94 to 97% of target sequences with high uniformity. OMEGA enables precision library construction at scale, with per-gene costs as low as $1.50, and offers a broadly applicable solution for bridging computational protein design with high-throughput experimental validation. We have developed OMEGA as an open-source software package and an easy-to-use Colab notebook to facilitate community adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.