ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
A simple model captures key characteristics of biological non-deterministic genotype-phenotype maps.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evolutionary dynamics under phenotypic uncertainty.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By connecting genotypic mutations to the higher-level phenotypes relevant for selection, genotype-phenotype (GP) maps play a key role in evolution. GP maps are typically investigated using computational models of biophysical phenotypes (for example, RNA secondary structures and simplified models of protein tertiary and quaternary structures), but GP map concepts are relevant beyond these specific models. While there has been significant progress in quantifying GP map properties and their evolutionary implications, this is largely limited to the simplest case, where each genotype corresponds to a single, categorical phenotype. Here, I turn to a more realistic, but also more complex, non-deterministic (ND) treatment, meaning that each genotype generates an ensemble of phenotypes. To provide a tool for tackling the additional complexity of ND GP maps, this paper identifies a tuneable synthetic model that produces an ND GP map reproducing central features of biophysical ND GP maps: phenotypic bias, genetic correlations, a tradeoff between genotypic robustness and evolvability and a non-negative trend between phenotypic robustness and evolvability. These features are reproduced for several alternative models combining additive genotype dependencies with non-linearities, suggesting that few ingredients are needed for these shared features to appear. Moreover, the synthetic ND GP map may be useful as a conceptually and computationally simpler model for addressing open questions about ND GP maps: for simulations linking GP map properties to evolutionary implications, for the development of sampling methods for ND GP maps and for extrapolations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.