ArticlePloS one2026
A qualitative study to inform the design and implementation of AI-driven diagnosis: Challenges, barriers, and clinical insights of physicians.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute febrile illnesses are significant clinical challenge in tropical regions due to overlapping symptomatology among infections such as dengue, scrub typhus, and leptospirosis. This diagnostic dilemma leads to delays in appropriate treatment and negatively impacted patient outcome due to limited diagnostic tool availability. Recent advancement in artificial intelligence (AI) application in healthcare help in developing diagnostic aiding tool in such clinical dilemma.
aimsStudy aimed to explore physicians' perspectives on diagnostic challenges of tropical Acute-febrile-illnesses and assess perceived utility of AI as a supportive tool in clinical decision-making.
methodsA qualitative interview was conducted using validated semi-structured interview guide using literature and expert opinion and validated by IPR method. To understand the physicians perspective on management infectious diseases in critical care, interview guide administered among ten physicians with 10-30 years of experience across different centres of India. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti software.
resultsFour major themes emerged: clinical experience and practice, diagnostic-challenges, diagnostic-parameters and decision-making, and AI integration in clinical-practice. However, no statistical test can be performed since study mainly focused to understand perception of physicians with respect to managing illness and hence prevalence cannot be determined. Diseases such as dengue, scrub typhus, and leptospirosis were reported as most prevalent, particularly during monsoon seasons. Key diagnostic challenges included overlapping symptoms, diagnostic delays, limited sensitivity/specificity of available tests, and cost constraints. Physicians primarily relied on clinical judgment and laboratory findings, despite the limitations. Most of the participants expressed positive attitudes toward the potential of AI as supportive tool, citing its ability to enhance diagnostic accuracy and streamline clinical workflow with proper validation.
conclusionsGrowing in clinical dilemma AI has significant role in diagnosis of tropical fever with integration of the clinical data & physician perspective can successfully able to incorporate in clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.