ArticlePloS one2026
The effect of Demodex-associated Bacillus oleronius proteins and hyperosmolarity on a human conjunctival epithelial cell line.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDemodex mites act as a carrier vector for the bacterium Bacillus oleronius. Antigenic proteins from this bacterium are capable of producing an inflammatory response. This study investigated the potential effects of Demodex spp.-associated Bacillus oleronius proteins and dry eye-induced hyperosmolarity on an immortalised human conjunctival epithelial (Chang) cell line.
methodsThe Wong Kilbourne derivative of the Chang (WKD) HeLa-modified conjunctiva-derived epithelial cell line was cultured in a series of NaCl-hyperosmolar conditions with various concentrations ranging from 350mOsm/L to 550mOsm/L. Chang cells were then exposed to semi-purified B.oleronius proteins at 2 µg and 6 µg either alone or in conjunction with dry eye-induced hyperosmolar (HO) stress at 2 µg + HO500 mOsm/L and 6 µg + HO500 mOsm/L. The cell viability was assessed with the RealTime-Glo MT cell viability assay.
resultsCompared to controls, the cell viability appeared to decrease in a dose-dependent manner. B. oleronius concentration at 6 µg showed significantly lower cell viability than both controls (p < 0.001) and 2 µg (p < 0.001). When 500mOsm/L was added to the 2 µg and 6 µg concentrations, the lowest cell viability was observed (p < 0.001). At 24 hours, the B.oleronius 2 μg combined with HO500 resulted in 38% viable cells, compared to 81% viability in B.oleronius 2 μg alone (p < 0.001). Similarly, the B.oleronius 6 μg combined with HO500 showed only 23% metabolising cells compared to 60% viability cells in B.oleronius 6 μg alone (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe results suggest that the presence of bacterial proteins and hyperosmolarity have a dose and time-dependent effect on cellular viability. These experiments suggest that patients affected with the comorbidity of dry eye disease and Demodex blepharitis could experience more severe signs than those with Demodex-associated blepharitis alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.