ArticlePloS one2026
Views, barriers, and facilitators of people living with human immunodeficiency virus and healthcare professionals regarding the use of a mobile health application to improve HIV self-care in Malaysia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe views, barriers, and facilitators of people living with HIV (PLWH) and healthcare professionals (HCPs), regarding the use of a mobile health application (m-HA) to improve HIV self-care were explored. SUBJECT AND
methodsSeventeen PLWH, nine doctors and two nurses who owned a smartphone and understood English or Malay were recruited from the infectious disease clinic of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted face-to-face using a topic guide, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two researchers independently coded transcripts and met to resolve discrepancies and develop themes. Data collection continued until thematic saturation was achieved.
resultsThree themes emerged: (1) Perceived benefits and concerns regarding m-HA usage: participants perceived m-HA could improve knowledge, but expressed concerns regarding information overload. Participants viewed m-HA as a means to enhance access to hospital services like clinic visits, medication refills, communication with HCPs, and medical records documentation. However, concerns regarding misuse, data confidentiality and security remained. (2) Perceived motivators of m-HA: participants perceived that high utilitarian and hedonic motivators increase m-HA usage. (3) Perceived influences to use m-HA: participants believed PLWH would use m-HA if introduced by their peers or HCPs.
conclusionThese findings provided information for developing a patient-centred m-HA to improve HIV self-care in Malaysia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.