ArticlePloS one2026
MEET-eaters: An agent-based model of food consumption practices at the household level.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MEET-eaters: An agent-based model of food consumption practices at the household level.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The shift towards less meat and more plant-based consumption is vital for environmental quality, public health, animal welfare, and food security. So far, no studies have examined both the two-way interaction between supermarket supply and household demand, and the role of decision-making about meals within households. This study introduces the agent-based model MEET-eaters, a computational model representing supermarkets, households, and consumers, that was developed to explore these two-way interactions in the Dutch socio-cultural context. The model simulates the effect of supply that is unlimited, fixed, or responsive to the meal choices of households. The approaches to choosing meals are based on the Dutch context. Model development and assumptions were reviewed with experts to enhance model acceptance and understanding. Two interventions were tested, that aimed at either consumer meal preference or supermarket supply. Results show that supermarket supply and household demand both strongly influence the meal choice. Moreover, patterns in meal choices of households are similar under unlimited and responsive supply of supermarkets. The intervention aiming to change supply was most effective when animal-based options were restricted. Results from the intervention changing dietary preference shows that targeting either a large group at random or a smaller high-status group resulted in a similar reduction of animal-based and increase in plant-based meals. For shorter intervention durations, meal choice reverted to pre-intervention patterns once the interventions were discontinued. The results imply that the persistent high availability of animal-based (meat, fish, dairy) options under responsive supply weakens incentives for consumers to purchase plant-based options. In addition, targeting population groups based on status or size could result in more plant-based consumption. Overall, the findings suggest that long-term policies are required to achieve and sustain a shift towards more plant-based diets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.