ArticlePloS one2026
The prevalence of neck pain and its association with studying device usage and posture among students at the University of Jordan: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeck pain is one of the leading causes of discomfort and disability, especially among students who use digital devices and books for studying. This study investigates the prevalence of neck pain among students of the University of Jordan and the association of potential risk factors, including posture and study devices.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey was conducted at the University of Jordan. Data were collected through structured, face-to-face interviews from eligible students stratified across the University's 20 faculties to ensure proportional representation. Known musculoskeletal disease, congenital anomalies, or prior neck/shoulder trauma or surgery cases were excluded. The questionnaire covered demographics, study behaviors, primary and secondary study utilities, posture, study duration, physical activity, and pain intensity reported based on NRS-11 scoring. Analysis was performed using JASP. We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
resultsThe data analyzed showed that out of the 507 students, (52.4%) complained of neck pain within the last week, with the most complained site of pain being the neck (56%), and the least being the left shoulder (5.2%). Sitting slouched was associated with approximately two-fold higher odds of reporting neck pain compared to sitting upright with full back support (OR = 2.18, CI [1.18, 4.04], p = 0.013). Using laptops (OR = 2.65, CI [1.45, 4.87], p = 0.002) or tablets (OR = 2.68, CI [1.34, 5.36], p = 0.005) for studying was associated with a nearly 2.7-fold increase in the odds of neck pain compared with using phones. In contrast, studying with books was not significantly associated with neck pain.
conclusionSlouched sitting and use of laptops or tablets were associated with higher odds of reporting neck pain, while studying primarily on phones was associated with lower odds of reporting neck pain compared with laptops and tablets. This study identified the urgent need for ergonomic education and interventions to promote healthier study habits and reduce musculoskeletal strain in students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.