ArticlePloS one2026
Effects of different intensities of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on corticospinal excitability and motor performance in healthy humans.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) has been applied in clinical settings to enhance the recovery of motor function following central nervous system lesions. However, the optimal intensity of rPMS for inducing neural plasticity and the mechanisms behind its action are not understood. We investigated the impacts of rPMS at two different stimulus intensities on motor performance and the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the arm muscles of 20 healthy adults. The biceps brachii (BB) muscle was subjected to rPMS in a 2-s ON and 2-s OFF cycle (for a total duration of 15 min). Two levels of rPMS were used: one that was sufficient to cause muscle contraction and one that was not. When investigating the effects on motor performance, an increase in elbow flexion torque and muscle activity was observed after rPMS at an intensity that elicited muscle contraction, whereas no significant changes were observed after rPMS at an intensity that did not cause muscle contraction. The MEPs of the BB increased after rPMS at an intensity that elicited muscle contraction, but no significant changes were observed after rPMS at an intensity that did not cause muscle contraction. Cervicomedullary MEP elicited by transmastoid electrical stimulation did not change after rPMS, implying that the increase in MEP was not accompanied by changes in the efficacy of cortico-motoneuronal synaptic transmission. These findings suggest that rPMS-induced muscle contraction can increase corticospinal excitability while maintaining spinal motoneuron excitability, thereby improving motor performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.