Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42172187›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Engaging individuals in digital health research panels: A qualitative study including participants in vulnerable positions.

Corine Oldhoff-Nuijsink, Mirjam P Fransen, Jeanine Suurmond, Linda W P Peute, Marloes E Derksen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Corine Oldhoff-NuijsinkDepartment of Medical Informatics, eHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5834-399X
Mirjam P FransenAmsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeanine SuurmondRadboud UMC, Department of Primary and Community Care, Geert Grooteplein, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Linda W P PeuteDepartment of Medical Informatics, eHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marloes E DerksenDepartment of Medical Informatics, eHealth Living & Learning Lab Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals in vulnerable circumstances often face challenges in accessing and utilizing digital health tools. They are also underrepresented in digital health research. Consequently, digital health tools may not be aligned with their specific needs and requirements, potentially intensifying health disparities. A research panel especially involving individuals in a vulnerable position could increase their representation in digital health research. This study examined motivation, facilitators and barriers, and prerequisites for initial participation and sustained involvement in a panel for digital health research. We conducted 23 semi-structured interviews with mainly individuals in vulnerable positions. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded and thematically analysed. The results indicated that most participants were motivated for engagement in a research panel on digital health. They aspired to contribute to the accessibility and usability of digital health, thereby benefiting not only themselves but also their peers. Additional motivations were to stay informed and to learn from developments in the field. Participants perceived recruitment efforts in community centres or the distribution of inclusively designed flyers as the most effective methods. Clear communication and timely feedback of results emerged as the most significant factors in sustaining long-term enthusiasm for panel participation. As the study was conducted in the Dutch context, cultural and contextual factors may limit the generalisability of the results to other settings. Nonetheless, by fostering intrinsic motivation, tailoring recruitment approaches, and addressing practical barriers, research panels can facilitate meaningful participation and contribute to the equitable development of digital health interventions.

Identifiers

PMID42172187
PMCPMC13196978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.