Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42172171›Full record

ReviewMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2026

Convolutional Neural Networks in Radiology: Principles, Clinical Applications, and a Practical Framework for Radiologists.

Ben Thompson, Jonathan Gibson, Shashank Chapala, Ali Shah, Rajesh Botchu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ben ThompsonCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jonathan GibsonCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Shashank ChapalaDepartment of Radiology, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
Ali ShahDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Nottingham University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Rajesh BotchuDepartment of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK, drrajeshb@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded within radiology workflows. In radiology, large language models may support reporting and communication tasks, while machine learning and deep learning models are increasingly used for image classification, segmentation, and quantitative analysis. This article is an educational review and practical guide rather than an experimental study. It summarizes how convolutional neural networks work, outlines the key stages of model development and validation, and discusses how modern language models may assist with code prototyping and troubleshooting. Although these tools may reduce technical barriers, clinically useful models still require appropriate datasets, external validation, transparent reporting, governance, and human oversight. This review aimed to help radiologists understand the principles, potential, and limitations of convolutional neural networks in contemporary practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningNatural language processingRadiology

Identifiers

PMID42172171
PMCPMC13395463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.