ArticleThe Journal of frailty & aging2026
Medicare costs and home time loss among fee-for-service beneficiaries by frailty and dementia status.
Article in The Journal of frailty & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrailty and dementia are associated with adverse health outcomes. Understanding their associated healthcare costs and quality of life can inform care of older adults.
objectiveTo assess Medicare costs and home time loss among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries across different combinations of frailty and dementia status RESEARCH
designRetrospective cohort study SUBJECTS: 5% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 and older in 2019 MEASURES: Frailty and dementia were measured using validated claims-based algorithms. Annualized Medicare costs and home time loss (days) were measured in Medicare claims over one year.
resultsAmong 1,148,964 Medicare beneficiaries (mean age 75.2 years, 57.7% female), 10.0% had frailty and 4.0% had dementia. Medicare costs increased with frailty severity. Dementia's association with costs varied by frailty level: higher costs among those without frailty (dementia vs. no dementia: $14,058.1 vs. $12,342.2 and lower costs among those with mild ($24,080.4 vs. $35,166.4) and moderate-severe frailty ($38,446.5 vs. $54,344.3). Both frailty and dementia were associated with greater home time loss, except among those with moderate-to-severe frailty in which home time loss was nearly identical with or without dementia (57.1 vs. 57.2 days).
conclusionsMedicare costs and home time loss increased with the severity of frailty while dementia's association with cost and home time loss varied by frailty level. Among those with moderate-severe frailty, individuals without dementia incurred higher costs despite similar home time. These findings underscore the importance of improved frailty recognition and care strategies addressing both conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.