Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42172005›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2026

Mental Health Care Utilization Following Eviction Moratorium Expirations.

Yimin Ge, Kathryn M Leifheit, Alene Kennedy-Hendricks, Iraj Qureshi, Sabriya Linton, Michael Fingerhood, Leah Robinson, Craig Evan Pollack, Matthew D Eisenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yimin GeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kathryn M LeifheitDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles.
Alene Kennedy-HendricksDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Iraj QureshiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sabriya LintonJohns Hopkins Center for Mental Health and Addiction Policy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael FingerhoodJohns Hopkins Center for Mental Health and Addiction Policy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Leah RobinsonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Craig Evan PollackDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Matthew D EisenbergDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Housing instability is associated with adverse mental health and increased health care use. Policies that reduce eviction risk may affect mental health-related health care utilization. Eviction moratoria enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic provide a natural experiment to examine these associations. Objective: To examine whether the lifting of eviction moratoria during the pandemic was associated with changes in mental health care utilization. Design, Setting, and Participants: A synthetic difference-in-differences approach was used, with state-week level, nationwide data of all-payer records of individuals with a mental health diagnosis or medication prescription in March to August 2020 and June to December 2021. The data were analyzed from November 2024 to November 2025. Two phases of eviction moratorium expirations were analyzed. Phase 1 included staggered expiration of state eviction moratoria from March to August 2020; phase 2 assessed the expiration of the federal eviction moratorium in August 2021, when some states maintained their own state-level eviction moratoria after the federal expiration. Exposures: State-level or federal-level eviction moratorium expirations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Weekly, state-level counts of unique patients who had (1) any outpatient mental health visit, (2) any psychotropic medication prescription, (3) outpatient visits associated with mood-related disorders, (4) outpatient visits associated with serious mental illness (SMI), and (5) suicide-related visits. Results: Of 8 963 310 individuals, 62% were female, and the mean (SD) age was 42.8 (21.5) years. Expiration of moratoria was associated with statistically significant increases in the weekly number of patients who were prescribed a psychotropic medication (0.57% in phase 1 and 1.17% in phase 2) and the number of patients who received outpatient care for SMI (3.42% in phase 1 and 3.13% in phase 2). By contrast, no measurable changes were observed in the overall patient count for mental health-related outpatient visits, outpatient visits associated with mood-related conditions, or suicide-related visits. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this differences-in-differences study suggest that the expiration of eviction moratoria was associated with increases in the mean number of patients with psychotropic medication prescriptions and outpatient visits for SMI. These findings underscore the importance of housing for psychiatric treatments and highlight the broader health care implications of housing policy decisions.

Indexed as

COVID-19HousingMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42172005
PMCPMC13197875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.