Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42171971›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026

The Acute Effects of Short-Bout High-Intensity Interval Training on Physiological and Perceptual Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Fraser Thurlow, Nicholas Cowley, Katie Slattery, Jonathon Weakley

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fraser ThurlowSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Technology Sydney, UTS-Rugby Australia Building, Moore Park Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2021, Australia. fraser.thurlow@uts.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0234-9615
Nicholas CowleySchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Katie SlatterySchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Technology Sydney, UTS-Rugby Australia Building, Moore Park Rd, Sydney, NSW, 2021, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2879-5488
Jonathon WeakleySchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-4885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the acute demands of short-bout high-intensity interval training can enhance training outcomes.

objectiveWe aimed to examine the acute physiological and perceptual demands of short-bout high-intensity interval training in athletes and identify how they are moderated by programming variables, fitness level and competitive level.

methodsWe searched the databases PubMed, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL on 2 December, 2025 for original research articles investigating running-based, short-bout high-intensity interval training in healthy athletes, aged 16-40 years, of any sex, who were recreationally active or above. Outcomes were analysed using a multi-level mixed-effects meta-analysis. The analysed outcomes were: average heart rate (HR

resultsFrom 139 data samples within 46 studies, the pooled demands (± 90% confidence limit) of short-bout high-intensity interval training were: HR

conclusionsShort-bout high-intensity interval training elicits a substantial physiological stimulus, which is influenced by programming variables, athlete fitness level and competitive level. Implementing an active rest period, longer repetition duration and a higher running intensity are effective strategies to maximise the aerobic stimulus, while shuttle runs increase the anaerobic demand.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingPerceptionHeart RateHumansLactic AcidOxygen ConsumptionPhysical ExertionPhysical FitnessRunningLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID42171971
PMCPMC13615151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.