ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Association Between Patient Health Questionnaire-4 Composite Score and Depression Diagnoses in a Free Clinic Setting: Pooled Cross-sectional Study.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the predictive validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in identifying depression diagnoses among patients in a student-run free clinic (SRFC) setting. This pooled cross-sectional study utilized electronic health record data from the Equal Access Clinic Network, a network of SRFCs affiliated with the University of Florida. All adult patients who completed PHQ-4 screening questions between October 2015 and February 2020 and had a corresponding ICD-10 diagnostic code were included (n = 2,498). The PHQ-4 composite score, calculated from binary responses to four mental health screening questions, served as the primary independent variable. The primary outcome was provider-diagnosed Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), defined by ICD-10 code F32.9. A multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, employment, and marital status, was used to evaluate the association between PHQ-4 scores and provider-diagnosed MDD. Higher PHQ-4 composite scores were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving an MDD diagnosis (adjusted OR = 2.047; 95% CI: 1.830-2.289; p < 0.001). The average PHQ-4 score was 1.17 (SD = 1.47), with 47.2% of patients scoring ≥ 1. Non-White patients, including those identifying as Black or from other underrepresented groups, had significantly lower odds of MDD diagnosis compared to White patients. The PHQ-4 is a strong predictor of MDD diagnoses in a free clinic setting and may serve as an efficient, low-burden screening tool for mental health concerns in underserved populations. Its integration into free clinic settings may support earlier identification and intervention, though disparities in diagnosis across racial and ethnic groups warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42171962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.